詮釋資料說明

文件類型

本館出版品

題名

論孫中山與澀澤榮一「知行觀」的當代啟示

題名(英)

The Contemporary Revelation of the Theory of Knowledge and Practice of Dr. Sun Yat-sen and Shibusawa Eiichi

作者

謝嘉文

期刊

孫學研究

ISSN

1996-2657

出版頻率

半年刊

出版西元年月日

2020/05/16

卷期

第28期

頁次

p.55-86

關鍵詞

孫中山 、 澀澤榮一 、 知行觀 、 孫文學說

關鍵詞(英)

Dr. Sun Yat-sen 、 Shibusawa Eiichi 、 heory of Knowledge and Practice 、 Sunology

全文內容

孫中山（1866-1925）是中國政治家、革命家的代表；澀澤榮一（1840-1931）則為日本實業界的巨人，他們在近代化的過程中，有著重要地位。孫中山主張「行易知難」，乃為振奮國人革命精神；澀澤榮一提出「知行合一」，反對紙上空談，要將仁義道德，作為修身處世的規矩準繩。他們的「知行觀」皆強調實踐的重要性，共同影響著蔣介石（1887-1975）的「力行哲學」，依此改變政風，對當代臺灣有其貢獻。筆者將焦點置於「知行觀」，乃因這是《孫文學說》最根本的革命之學，是心理建設的根源；另一方面，澀澤榮一則強調要將儒家學問體現在日常之中，成為生活的指南。他們的「知行觀」皆強調行動的重要性，告誡人們要遵循儒家仁愛的情操，以身躬行；然而，身為政治家與實業家的思想終究不同，他們分別代表了中國與日本對於中國儒家不同的理解，因而產生很大的對話空間，在中國近代化歷史中，拉開了思想融通與相互抵觸的帷幕。

全文內容

Dr. Sun Yat-sen (1866-1925) was a politician and a representative revolutionist in China, while Shibusawa Eiichi (1840-1931) was an industry tycoon in Japan. Both played pivotal roles throughout the course of modernization. Dr. Sun Yat-sen advocated “it is easier done than understood”, which was to inspire the revolutionary spirit of the Chinese people, while Shibusawa Eiichi proposed “knowledge and action go hand in hand”, to oppose against idle theorizing and regard benevolence and morality as the standard rules of self-cultivation. Their “theory of knowledge and practice” emphasized the importance of implementation, which had a joint influence on the Philosophy of Praxis of Chiang Kai-shek (1887-1975) who changed his political style as a result and contributed to contemporary Taiwan. The author focused on the “theory of knowledge and practice”, because it is the most fundamental revolutionary learning in “Sunology”, the source of mental preparation. On the other hand, Shibusawa Eiichi emphasized manifesting Confucianism in daily life to become a guide in life. Their “theory of knowledge and practice” emphasizes on the importance of action, admonishing people to follow the noble thoughts of Confucianism and carry out the thoughts in person. However, the thoughts of politicians and industrialists are not the same after all. They each represented China’s and Japan’s differed understanding of Chinese Confucianism, thus leaving great room for dialogue and leading to the unveiling of ideological integration and conflict in China's contemporary history.

出版者

國立國父紀念館

出版地

臺北市

備註

投稿日：民國109年2月21日；接受刊登日：民國109年5月4日。