從國族意識發展的前提論領土爭議與理性對話並存的矛盾

學習筆記勘誤意見

下載

0 次數

點擊

66 次數

題名(英): The contradiction to the theory of the coexistence between the territorial controversy and rational dialogue under the sense of Nationalism

關鍵詞(英): The sense of Nationalism 、 The movements of religious confrontation 、 Sino-Japanese territorial disputes concerning the Diaoyu Islands 、 Sino-Philippines' sovereign arguments in Southern China Sea 、 The Israel-Arabian nations' and India-Pakistan's territorial conflicts and religious confrontation

全文內容: 　　本文特別就「領土爭議與理性對話」是否可以並存的主題來解析。如果加上「國族意識發展」與「宗教衝突對立」的背景前提下，「領土爭議與理性對話」是否還可並存運作的話題，在文選擇當前在國際社會中所存在的幾個例子：例如中國與日本在釣島，以及中國與菲律賓在南海，因國族意識（The Sense of Nationalism）帶來的主權爭執，能否理性對話？再來則是探討印度與巴基斯坦的宗教衝突，加上國族意識，以及以色列與阿拉伯國家的國族意識、還隱含著宗教不同信仰，他們的對抗，對「領土爭議」的話題，可否「理性對話」？其實，領土爭議不是爭執的唯一因素，國族意識更為關鍵，上個世紀八零年代，美蘇之所以能夠和解，因為雙方沒有國族意識在背後作崇，因此爭霸可以妥協。但是這個世紀，中美之間很難和解，就是因為雙方均有民族主義在背後煽動。

全文內容: 　　This article is concentrating on analyzing the contradiction to the theory of the coexistence between the territorial disputes and rational dialogue under the sense of Nationalism, and in addition to the conflicts of religion. The author tries to choose several cases from this International Society to illustrate the backgrounds mentioned above: such as the Sino-Japanese territorial disputes concerning the Diaoyu Islands and Sino-Philippines' sovereign arguments in Southern China Sea; or the Israel-Arabian nations' and India-Pakistan's territorial conflicts and religious confrontation. In fact, the territorial dispute may not be the sole factor causing the war, and there is more important element like the sense of Nationalism, which can be the key factor to raise any confrontation between the states.