臺海兩岸孫中山研究的趨勢
本館出版品
臺海兩岸孫中山研究的趨勢
The Trend of Sunology Research of the Two Sides of the Taiwan Strait
孫學研究
1996-265-7
半年刊
2023/5/16
第34期
p.1-29
民國38(1949)年起,臺海兩岸政權開始長期分隔,分別由國民黨與共產黨為執政黨,由於歷史記憶與政治立場截然不同,對於過去的詮釋也有顯著差異,唯有孫中山是兩黨皆推崇的政治領袖。孫中山是國民黨永遠的總理,國民黨中央遷臺之後,黨統的脈絡由總裁蔣中正帶往臺灣;而以宋慶齡為首的國民黨左翼在中共建政後,另組國民黨革命委員會(民革)參與中共政權,也宣稱繼承孫中山之遺志。有鑑於孫中山在聯俄容共時期(第一次國共合作)所扮演的關鍵角色,以及其經濟擘劃與當前中國大陸經濟發展的方向相類,也使中共習近平主席於辛亥革命110周年紀念大會中稱:中共是孫中山最忠實的繼承者。然而,孫中山只有一個,到底是國民黨執政的臺灣承其續,抑或是共產黨執政的大陸承其遺,各自又承繼了哪一個部分,有著怎樣的體會,都體現在臺海兩岸的孫學研究裡。本文以此為切點,以較宏觀的視角,探討七十餘年來臺海兩岸在孫學研究上的變化,並以時段為背景加以探析,希望能為將來參酌。
The two sides of the Taiwan Strait have had separate regimes since 1949. The Kuomintang (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) are the two major political parties in power. Differences in historical memory and political stances inevitably lead to vastly divergent perspectives on the past, and the political leader recognized by parties on both sides is Dr. Sun Yat-sen. Dr. Sun Yat-sen ruled the KMT as its unchanging prime minister. After the KMT Central Committee relocated to Taiwan, President Chiang Kai-shek introduced the idea of one-party rule to the island. Leftist KMT members, led by Soong Ching Ling, formed the Revolutionary Committee Of The Chinese Kuomintang (the Revolutionary Committee) soon after the CCP was founded in order to join the CCP regime, insisting that it had inherited Dr. Sun Yat-sen’s mandate. In view of the crucial role of Dr. Sun Yat-sen during the period of alliance with Russia and the CCP (the first united alliance between the KMT and the CCP), as well as similarities between his economic plan and Mainland China’s current economic development direction, Chairman Xi Jinping claimed at the 110 Anniversary of the Xinhai Revolution Assembly, “The CCP is the most loyal successor to Sun Yat-sen.” Naturally, however, there can be only one Dr. Sun Yat-sen. Is it the KMT government that continues Dr. Sun Yat-sen’s legacy, or the CCP? Which traits did they take from him? What kinds of backgrounds do they have? Sunology research conducted on both sides of the strait reflects all of these factors. This study used these questions as a jumping-off point to investigate the macro-level shifts that have occurred in Sunology research on both sides of the strait over the past 70 years. Analyses were performed using this timeline as a foundation for future reference.
國立國父紀念館
臺北市
投稿日:民國111年12月20日;接受刊登日:民國112年4月26日