孫中山法治思想的實踐:論檢察官對被告人權之保障
本館出版品
孫中山法治思想的實踐:論檢察官對被告人權之保障
Sun Yat-sen thought the rule of law on the prosecutor's practice -- protection of rights of the accused
孫學研究
1996-265-7
半年刊
2011/11/12
第11期
P141-171
立法院於2009年3月31日審議通過「公民與政治權利國際公約」、「經濟社會文化權利國際公約」,並制定「公民與政治權利國際公約及經濟社會文化權利國際公約施行法」,於同年12月10日公布施行。透過實定法之落實,保障人權思想成為司法實務者不得不注意之課題,亦成為檢察官應著重之事項。
辛亥革命造成中國劇烈的社會變革,也影響國家建設的制度設計,本文從法制面及實務面探討,首先介紹孫中山先生有關保障人權的法治思想,其次從保障人權思潮之緣由及其與檢察制度形成歷史之關聯切入,論述檢察職能與人權保障之競合關係,再分別就辛亥革命百年來,我國檢察官所參與刑事訴訟程序的偵查、公訴、執行三個主要階段,闡述保障人權思想在檢察官上開三大階段實務操作時之體現情形,以及檢察官如何在職權行使中精進提升檢察實質功能以保障人權,最後提出結論與展望。
本文認為,檢察制度創設之目的,並非如現今社會所認知係為「摘奸發伏,打擊犯罪」而來,毋寧是為了節制法官及警察兩種國家權力侵害人民權利而設置,檢察官制度從孕育之初,即帶有保障人權之濃厚色彩。無論在實施偵查、實行公訴與指揮裁判執行等階段,檢察官均應善盡其客觀性義務,建立保障被告權利之意識,以求法的貫徹與實現。
Legislative Yuan on March 31, 2009 to consider through the "International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights," "International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights", and to develop "the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Enforcement Act", in On 10 December the same year promulgated. Through the implementation of the Positive Law, the judicial protection of human rights ideas into practice have had to pay attention to the issue, has become prosecutors should focus on the issues.
Chinese Revolution caused dramatic social change, also affect the design of the system of nation-building, the paper surface and from the practical side of the legal system, first introduced the Sun Yat-sen thought the rule of law on the protection of human rights, followed by the thought of reason from the protection of human rights and the prosecution system and its cut into the formation history of the association, discussed the functions of prosecution and protection of human rights of the competing relationship, and then were on the Revolution of years, our prosecutors are involved in criminal proceedings, investigation, prosecution, implementation of the three main stages, the prosecutor explained to protect human rights thinking on the opening stage of practical operation of the three cases reflect, and how prosecutors exercise in sophistication in terms of real functions to enhance the protection of human rights prosecution, the final conclusions and prospects.
This paper argues that the creation of the prosecution system is not intended as the cognitive system as a modern society, "rape hair pick-volt, the fight against crime" from, rather judges and police to control two kinds of state power against people's rights and set up, prosecutors from the system bred at the beginning, that protection of human rights with a strong color. Whether in the implementation of the investigation, prosecution and directing the implementation phases of the implementation of the referee, the prosecutor should fulfill its obligation to objectivity, to establish the awareness to protect the rights of defendants, in order to implement the law and implementation.
國立國父紀念館
臺北市
GPN:2009503228