詮釋資料說明

文件類型

本館出版品

題名

民生主義育樂兩篇補述的實施策略 從人工智慧與美術教育談起

題名(英)

Implementation Strategies of Two Supplementary Chapters to Lectures on the Principle of People’s Livelihood: Education and Recreation
Artificial Intelligence and Arts Education

作者

張子麟

期刊

孫學研究

ISSN

1996-265-7

出版頻率

半年刊

出版西元年月日

2024/05/16

卷期

第36期

頁次

p.89-114

關鍵詞

人工智慧、美術、價值接受模式、民生主義、民生主義育樂兩篇補述

關鍵詞(英)

artificial intelligence, art, value acceptance model, Principle of the People’s Livelihood, Two Supplementary Chapters to Lectures on the Principle of People’s Livelihood: Education and Recreation

全文內容

作者藉人工智慧(AI)產生畫作參賽衍生的爭議，從AI的發展與美術教育探討〈民生主義育樂兩篇補述〉的實施策略。首先，梳理AI對美術的影響，再以價值接受模式分析人們對AI作畫接受或牴觸的意向，最後對美術教育方針提出建議。本文作者將探討的領域延伸至美術議題，為充實孫學作出貢獻。人工智慧(AI)產生畫作參賽爭議事件中，正反兩方的爭論可為美術教育方針提供省思。有鑑於蔣介石基於孫文的民生主義提出〈民生主義育樂兩篇補述〉，其中即包含美術教育方針。然而，以其生活年代距今已有數十年，社會的運作與現今大相逕庭，使作者擬以畫作參賽爭議事件，重新檢視〈民生主義育樂兩篇補述〉中的美術教育方針，並為此提出建議。

全文內容

The author used the controversy arising from the entry of artificial intelligence (AI)-generated artwork into art competitions as a basis to discuss the implementation strategies of Two Supplementary Chapters to Lectures on the Principle of People’s Livelihood: Education and Recreation in the context of AI development and art education. First, the impact of AI on art was determined, and the value acceptance model was used to assess people’s willingness to accept or reject AI-generated artwork. Then, recommendations were made for art education guidelines. In this article, the author broadened the scope of discussion to include art-related issues in order to supplement Sunology Research. In the controversy surrounding AI-generated artwork, arguments for and against its entry into competitions serve as points of reflection for art education guidelines. Art education guidelines were included in Two Supplementary Chapters to Lectures on the Principle of People’s Livelihood: Education and Recreation, proposed by Chiang Kai-shek based on Dr. Sun Yat-sen’s Principle of the People’s Livelihood. However, several decades have passed since the era in which they lived, and social operations and the way society works are vastly different today. Therefore, the author used the controversy arising from the entry of AI-generated artwork into art competitions as a basis to reexamine the art education guidelines from Two Supplementary Chapters to Lectures on the Principle of People’s Livelihood: Education and Recreation and proposed recommendations accordingly.

出版者

國立國父紀念館

出版地

臺北市

備註

投稿日：民國112 年7月28日；接受刊登日：113年4月30日