憲法中「統帥權」定位問題之研究－以中華民國憲法規範的分析為例

相關內容

查無資料

學習筆記勘誤意見

下載

0 次數

點擊

264 次數

題名(英): The Research on the Definition of "Presidential Commanding Power" in the Constitution of R.O.C -- Analysis Based on the Constitution

關鍵詞(英): Presidential commanding power 、 The cabinet system 、 The presidential system 、 The hybrid system 、 National defense system 、 National defense military conference

全文內容: 　　我國憲法36條規定總統統率全國陸海空軍。但憲法並未進一步說明總統「統帥權」的範圍與內涵。憲法第137條規定國防之組織以法律定之。但國防法卻延遲至89年才完成立法程序。其間，當政者為便宜行事，每有專擅表現，因而導致國防體制紊亂、權責不符。
　　現今政府已完成修憲與制定國防二法。但國防體制的建立與改造，經緯萬端，故本文嘗試從世界各國憲法「統帥權」之規範做一初探。進而評析我國憲法和國防二法之「統帥權」行使與規範。

全文內容: 　　Constitution article 36 of the Republic of China regulates that the president shall be Commander in Chief of the army, navy and air force. However, it doesn't further specify the scope and meaning of the presidential commanding power. Constitution article 137 regulates that the organization of national defense should be ruled by law. However, the legislation of National Defense Law wasn't accomplished until 2000. During the period, the authorities, sometimes arbitrary, acted as they saw fit, thus leading to the disorderliness of the national defense system and the inconformity of power and obligation.
　　Even though the government has accomplished the amendment of the Constitution and the legislation of the two laws of national defense, the establishment and reconstruction of the national defense system remains complex. Therefore, this thesis attempts to discuss the presidential commanding power defined in the constitutions of other nations and then review the exertion and regulation of the presidential commanding power stipulated in the constitution of Republic of China and the two laws of national defense.